I will admit that I am guilty of it. I am sure that as you read this, you can think of a time when you were guilty of it as well. The second glances, the staring, the whispers, and even the small children blatantly conversing about it due to their understandable ignorance. The wheelchairs, the crutches, and even missing or prosthetic limbs are the noticeable scars that stereotype them into a group. They are our true heroes: the wounded warriors.
While I cannot comment on the state of being physically injured myself, I have spoken to my share of wounded veterans from wars present and past. This allows me to give my opinion on the subject with some experiences rather than just being a talking head. Before I begin, I want you to think honestly about your opinions on the healthcare that veterans receive when returning with catastrophic injuries. Do you think they receive the proper care in a timely manner? Do you think they are pampered and deserve less than they are entitled to? Are you one of the majority who never really consider the care that our heroes receive and just assume it is adequate? I hope that by blogging about this topic, I will at least have changed one person’s views or made a group aware of the shortchange veterans often receive.
In 2007, The Washington Post wrote an article covering the care, or lack-there-of, that veterans were receiving at Walter Reed Army Medical Center near Washington D.C. The paper detailed the “moldy, vermin-infested outpatient housing and overworked, sometimes incompetent, staff” (Katel, 2007). This lead to the firings of many prominent officials including the Walter Reed Commander and the Army Surgeon General. In March of 2007, President Bush assembled a blue-ribbon commission headed by Senator Bob Dole, himself a wounded WWII veteran, to start the wheels of change in the Department of Veterans Affairs. That committee returned with six recommendations for improvement that include: simplifying the disability rating system, assignment of a care counselor to every seriously wounded service member, improved care for PTSD and traumatic brain injury (TBI), and increase support for the relatives taking care of wounded service member (Katel, 2007). While this was a welcome attempt at change, many feel the reports did not change enough.
“Buyer says the Dole-Shalala commission did zero in on some of the top problems in veterans' `care — above all the call for a patient-centered philosophy. The Defense and Veterans Affairs departments tend to use budgetary justifications for limiting veterans' options he says. ‘We take that wounded warrior, and in sub-acute care, we send them back to their homes — and home may be two or three or four hours from a military medical facility. And when they're so distant, we ought to be able to contract for that care,’ Buyer says. ‘Sometimes the green-eyeshade guys start making decisions based on dollars, not on patients’” (Katel, 2007).
That quote summarizes the care that veterans tend to receive. The ideology of capitalism by completing the bare minimums or, as with the rest of the military, the lowest-bidder concept. If these organizations have to short change a service member in their quest for care by providing inadequate coverage to save a few pennies, they will.
America was founded on the fair treatment of all citizens and certain inalienable rights. I ask you, do you think these service members’ rights are being met? They fight, risk their lives, and some give the ultimate sacrifice so everyone else’s rights are protected. So where is their justice? Where is their fair treatment and timely treatment when dealing with wounds sustained so Americans can sleep soundly at night? The VA needs a drastic change to provide for these heroes. The only question left is, “When will it happen?”
Katel, P. (2007, August 31). Wounded veterans. Retrieved October 21, 2011, from the CQ Researcher database.
Just a few of our wounded heroes
The Wounded Warrior logo. A charity I support and recommend.